Sunday, 27 November 2011

How to handle a punch in Martial Arts


This is from our Graphics Facebook group.I asked the question from which members of the group replied. No one said they had a lot of martial art experience but some people referred me to videos and Simon said he just takes it in the face.


Although this is visual research It saves me doing a transcript

This is from - http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f11/how-take-punch-283320/
Matt Thornton claims to be an amateur fighter and what he says sound about right taking an educated guess.

My friend from back home used to do boxing and had a license so I asked him how to take a punch!
 

Friday, 25 November 2011

A History Of Type // Lecture 8

- Give a simple introduction the history of typography
- Introduce the six main classifications of type
- Introduce some famous type faces and their related connotations
- Introduce the metalinguistic function of typography
- Talking about kerning and x-heights

Typography =
Meta-communication
Paralinguistics
Kinesics

Type Classifications:
Humanist | Old Style | Transitional | Modern
Slab Serif (Egyptian) | Sans Serif

Humanist
The Humanist types (sometimes referred to as Venetian) appeared during the 1460s and 1470s, and were modelled not on the dark gothic scripts like textura, but on the lighter, more open forms of the Italian humanist writers. The Humanist types were at the same time the first roman types.

Old Style

The Old Style (or Garalde) types start to demonstrate a greater refinement—to a large extent augmented by the steadily improving skills of punchcutters. As a consequence the Old Style types are characterised by greater contrast between thick and thin strokes, and are generally speaking, sharper in appearance, more refined. You can see this, perhaps most notably in the serifs: in Old Style types the serifs on the ascenders are more wedge shaped 

Transitional
The 17th and 18th centuries introduced new trends in Western typography: the letters received greater contrast between thick and thin strokes, bracketed serifs turned into fine almost straight lines, and the stressing became vertical. William Caslon, Johann Fleischmann, and John Baskerville made notable contributions to the development of the so-called transitional Roman typefaces. Caslon-Bold, Dustismo Roman Bold, Sanskrit Roman Bold Italic fonts inherit the best traits of this particular tradition in western typography.



Modern Typeface
Modern fonts are recognizable by their thin, long horizontal serifs, and clear-cut thick/thin transitions in the strokes. The stress is vertical, i.e. there is no slant on the letters.
They tend to look very structured and could be considered cold. Having said that, modern fonts can look really eye-catching and very elegant at large sizes. They are not suitable for large amounts of body text, either on the web or in print. When used for body copy in print, an effect called “dazzling” occurs, the thick lines become very prominent while the thin lines almost disappear. It’s best to keep them for headings and sub-headings. You may not use the modern typeface too often, but as a designer it’s nice to be able to pick out and recognize font categories.
You probably have a number of Modern fonts on your computer already. Some examples are Didot, Onyx and Times Bold. I’ve picked out seven more which are available to download for free.
 http://www.sitepoint.com/the-modern-typeface/

Modern Slab Serif
During the early 19th century, especially in Britain, letter drawers began creating thicker versions of letterforms common in European printing during the 18th century, e.g., the types of the Fourniers, Giambattista Bodoni, or the Didots. These new letter styles began to appear throughout British society. Artists, artisans, printers, and typefounders … they all would come to embrace these new ideas. In the realm of typefounding, these faces came to represent the age of industrialization, and also the beginnings of advertising. This also marked the birth hour for typefaces that would be marketed by their makers for “display” use. Quite common today!
As far as the typefaces go, the first examples seem to have been all-caps alphabets; faces with lowercase letters would come a bit later. In the UK, many of these early slab serifs were called “Egyptians,” even though they had very little to do with Egypt. Enthusiasm in Western Europe was quite high during this time period; Napoleon and his army had faced off against the British there, and hieroglyphics were in the process of decipherment. Perhaps the naming of typefaces as “Egyptian” had something to do with this popularity.

http://www.linotype.com/3493/introduction.html

Sans Serif Typface
In typography, a sans-serif, sans serif, san serif or simply sans typeface is one that does not have the small projecting features called "serifs" at the end of strokes. The term comes from the French word sans, meaning "without".
In print, sans-serif fonts are used for headlines rather than for body text.[1] The conventional wisdom holds that serifs help guide the eye along the lines in large blocks of text. Sans-serifs, however, have acquired considerable acceptance for body text in Europe.
Sans-serif fonts have become the de facto standard for body text on-screen, especially online. This is partly because interlaced displays may show twittering on the fine details of the horizontal serifs. Additionally, the low resolution of digital displays in general can make fine details like serifs disappear or appear too large.
Before the term “sans-serif” became standard in English typography, a number of other terms had been used. One of these outmoded terms for sans serif was gothic, which is still used in East Asian typography and sometimes seen in font names like Century Gothic or Trade Gothic.
Sans-serif fonts are sometimes, especially in older documents, used as a device for emphasis, due to their typically blacker type color.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans-serif

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Essay Bibliography

I'm pretty sure I'm going to do the 1st essay question:
  • Focusing on specific examples, describe the way that modernist art & design was a response to the forces of modernity?
Bibliography
Bardnard - Graphic Design + Communication - 741.601
I chose this book because there is a whole chapter on modernism within graphic design.



Richard Hollis - Swiss Graphic Design - 741.604
'International developing modernist design', It also mentions new technology, politics + social issues within graphic design.

Rock Poyner - No More Rules, Graphic Design + Post modernism - 741.601
Although the title is post modernism I presume the book must cover modernism briefly?

Quentin Newark - What is Graphic Design - 741.6
P20 - Style as politics
P18 - The dilemma of style



Stephen J. Eskilson - Graphic Design, a new history - 741.605
'Relationship between design + manufacturing, technology, social change + commercial force

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

High Culture / Low Culture - Lecture 7

 
High Culture / Low Culture- Handout.

  1. Introduction The urge to criticism is almost natural within us – day in, day out we make critical evaluations of one sort or another. And this tendency is inevitably attached to our pursuit for quality of life. Distinguishing between good and bad has been the realm of philosophical debate for centuries. In relation to the pursuit of good/bad in art philosopher have established the realm of enquiries known as Beauty, Taste and Aesthetics.

  1. The term avant-garde in its first usage in relation to art, referred to the ability for art in general to be the ‘avant-garde of society’, the ability for art to exercise a positive influence on society. By the late 19th century the term was adopted from its political usage at the time, and came to denote specific artistic tendencies that outdistanced the contemporary artistic movements. By the early 20th century the term is adopted in art criticism and there exists a notion of a plurality of avant-gardes in competition with one another. In the ideology of the avant-garde two currents exist – a right wing current and a left wing current. The right wing current has been the most prominent and according to this tendency innovation is the sole objective of avant-gardism. The left wing current holds that artists should be progressive on a social and political level and should be committed to class struggle; however, artistic innovation in this context is potentially perceived as decadent, elitist and bourgeois. In the past, the left wing trends which have avoided artistic innovation because of its elitist implications have run the risk of following academic traditions in art, (for example the Mexican Muralists). Avant-garde artists who align themselves with the Left are therefore faced with a dilemma of opposing interests. Defining elements of the avant-garde are:- (1)Its linear conception of history – what the avant-garde artist achieves now, will be what other artists follow on to emulate in the future. (2)Historical Determinism – this is the idea that avant-garde will eventually become incorporated and function successfully in the future. (3)Evolutionist Conception of History – In the ideology of the avant-garde there is always an implied notion of progress; progress toward correcting the problems of the world. (4)Novelty – the idea of the new surpassing the old. (5)The avant-garde as elite – by definition the avant-garde is an elite minority. The irony here is that the avant-garde began as an assault on the bourgeoisie. Roland Barthes posed in ‘The Death of the Avant-Garde’ - it was dying because it was recognized as significantly artistic by the same class whose values it rejected.’ The avant-garde ideology justifies the role of the artist and the ways he/she might operate, e.g. subversive, experimental, oppositional, revolutionary, dandy and so on. The avant-garde in the 20th Century has become an essential part of the art market and is both sought out and supported as official culture; examples today would include:- the Tate Gallery’s Turner Prize, Charles Saatchi’s contemporary art collection, and corporate sponsorship in such forms as the BT New Contemporaries exhibitions.

  1. Taste & Beauty Significant contributions were made in the 18th C. as to the nature of beauty. Philosophical enquiry shifted from considering the nature of beautiful objects, to the way ‘men’ react to beauty and to the idea of beauty being a subjective, psychological response – the idea of ‘beauty being in the eye of the beholder’. For a number of philosophers and aestheticians, inherent within the idea of perceiving beauty, is the notion of being ‘able’ to perceive beauty, having the mental faculty to do so. Connoisseurship and Taste for the aristocratic gentlemen were predicated around the transcendental faculty for appreciating beauty and therefore evaluative judgements were tenable. The appreciation of beauty was considered an important and morally uplifting quality for the aristocracy. By the 19th C. the various philosophies of Beauty and Taste began to emerge into what we know as the philosophy of Aesthetics.

  1. Clive Bell’s Theory Aesthetic experience may roughly be described as the experience of viewing beauty. For Kant, “Beauty in its aesthetic sense can be defined as the ‘quality’ in an object which when viewed gives pleasure.” Form becomes the essential quality, and aesthetic readings of art tend to pursue the formal rather than other modes of analysis. Clive Bell’s influential aesthetic theory makes this approach clear by castigating the distractive features of narrative/”descriptive” pictures. Significant Form is the quality within paintings/sculpture that makes them Art. However, for Bell (like others), one has to have the faculty to appreciate ‘significant form’. This makes his argument circular and impossible to contradict – thus, for a viewer contradicting Bell’s claim, Bell could simply reply that such a viewer did not have the sensitivity to appreciate aesthetic form.

  1. Art for Art’s Sake One effect of Bell’s thesis is the total rejection of descriptive genre painting. In its place is the adoption of an Art for Art’s Sake stance. Such a stance is integral to the ideology of the Avant-Garde. For a number of theorists in the first half of the 20th C. (see Adorno & the Frankfurt School, early Greenberg), avant-garde production was the key to what was good and could be seen as oppositional to popular art forms and kitsch which were seen as a threat to civilised culture.

  1. Greenberg’s Theory The alignment between the Avant-Garde and Modernism was to be entrenched within the theoretical writings of Clement Greenberg. Greenberg, like Bell, sees figurative art as getting in the way of aesthetic experience. Being responsive to the aesthetic quality of an object requires a contemplative mode of being ‘disinterested’. Greenberg talks about approaching art with ‘the eye’ alone – and that this should be the sole criteria for judging art if we are to distinguish good from bad. However, the question needs to be put, is art just about pleasing the ‘eye’? Is it not the case that art is also about engaging the mind? In that respect Greenberg’s later theoretical position does not progress his earlier critical stance towards Kitsch.

  1. Kitsch For Greenberg and others kitsch could be characterised as the various forms of popular culture, such as Hollywood movies, advertisements, and commercial art. The more accurate meaning of Kitsch actually refers to those objects which draw from and aspire to High Art, although their appeal to popular taste would always be a primary criteria: However, the term is more commonly used to refer more broadly to popular cultural artefacts and is interchangeable with terms like ‘cheap tack’, ‘trashy’, ‘bad taste’.

  1. High & Low The distinction between High Art and Low Art presents a number of problems. However, I would like to draw attention to two of those for now. Firstly, with what kind of authority should we take and consider those claims to Art which fix themselves firmly within the realm of the popular, the easily accessible, digestible and intelligible? Where might we place ‘serious’ fine art production (the kind located on Fine Art degree programmes and within the pages of Artforum) in a culture which proposes Ikea prints, tiger and elephant drawings and limited edition collectors plates as fine art also? And secondly, how should we cope with the fact that the realm of Low Art has successfully been ‘raided’ by modern art – Manet, Picasso, Duchamp, Warhol, Rauschenberg, Koons etc, - and become subject matter for High Art?

  1. Evaluation How might we evaluate good and bad? “Well, it all comes down to personal taste” is a popular subjectivist response, but one which I would say amounts to bad criticism. This approach equates ‘I like’ with ‘is good’, and has a number of problems. Firstly, we often like what we know to be bad, and dislike what we know are good. Secondly, statements such as “I like this painting” or “this sculpture is crap”, don’t reveal anything about the works themselves, but tend more to be facts about the person making the statement. Alternatively, the intuitionist response, would posit that a viewer makes a judgement based on intuition; this avoids the problems relating to like=good, however, this approach is still subjective in character and judgements are impossible to substantiate. A third and more satisfactory approach explores the criteria and contexts for what might constitute good. Applying the philosopher R.M. Hare’s relativist approach, it is acknowledged that the criteria for ‘good’ will shift according to context. Given the expanded practice of contemporary art, it is no longer relevant to apply only those evaluative criteria appropriate to ‘traditional’ art, e.g., skill, naturalism, narrative content. The close of the lecture, therefore, invites the audience to consider what evaluative criteria might be employed, (with discrimination), to contemporary art, in making the judgements ‘good art’ / ‘bad art’

Bibliography
Bayley, S. Taste: The Secret Meaning of Things
Bell, C. Art (1913)
Crow, T. Modern Art in the Common Culture (1996)
Dickie, G. Aesthetics: An Introduction (1971)
Greenberg, C. essays in Harrison,C. & Wood,P. Art in Theory 1990-1900
Lloyd-Jones,P. Taste Today
Strinati,D. An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture
Hadjinicolaou, N. ‘On the Ideology of Avant-Gardism’ in Praxis Volume 6
Krauss, R. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths
Poggioli, R. The Theory of the Avant-Garde
Wood, P. The Challenge of the Avant-Garde





























Friday, 18 November 2011

Russian Revolution Seminar.

  • Russian October Revolution 1917
  • led by Lenin
  • OCTOBER (Ten Days That Shook The World)
  • 1927 Director: Sergei Eisenstein
  • 1917 – 1921 Russian civil war
Propaganda

1917 – mid 1920s:  Intense artistic experimentation

1917 – mid 1920s:  Intense artistic experimentation

Malevich & Suprematism

El Lissitzky – ‘Beat the Whites with the Red wedge’ 

‘Books’ poster by Rodchenko

The Constructivists:
Aim = ‘…achieving the communistic expression of material structures’.
Lenin New economic Policy 1921

Stepanova & Popova
‘voile and prints have not just become artistically acceptable, they have reached the level of real art, and have brought the rich colours and intense ornamentation of contemporary art to the cities of our immense Republic’ Aranovich, D 1929

We shall complete the plan of great works


Decree 394 (1962)
‘..about industrial equipment and consumer goods quality improvement by artistic engineering methodology implementation’
Summary
  • Revolution was a new opportunity for art to progress
  • Constructivists desire to make art useful 
  • Aim that art should help ‘construct’ new society
  • Use of new techniques and abstract aesthetic
  • By end of 1920s artistic freedom curtailed
  • 1934 Stalin decrees ‘Socialist Realism’ only

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Proverbally Your - Message & Delivery FEEDBACK



Very happy with the feedback I got. Generally the best I have received so far. I think I have put the most effort into this project also and the results have paid off. It has been quite lucky that things have just come together for me, for example the laser cutter was great for cutting my stamp and making it possible. I think it was down to orginisation this time around. I managed to book the laser cutter and I also booked a print room slot weeks in advance to make sure I got in which definitely paid off.